RIAP PERTUMBUHAN JATI UNGGUL NUSANTARA ROTASI KEDUA DI KEBUN PERCOBAAN COGREG UNIVERSITAS NUSA BANGSA

Main Article Content

Kustin Bintani Meiganati

Abstract

The copies JUN in the UNB Experimental Garden is the second rotation, this is an economic and ecological consideration. According to previous studies that sengon copies can be done in 3 rotations. JUN and sengon have similar physical characteristics of wood. The characteristics of the wood include the water content, density and density of wood. So that it is assumed, the growth of sengon stands also has similarities with the growth of JUN stands. In this research, it will be seen whether the JUN increment in the second rotation will produce results that are in line with expectations, and whether it will be feasible to continue in the third rotation. Riap in the second rotation will be a consideration for the next rotation. The prediction of increment in the next rotation can be calculated by knowing the increment in the second rotation. This study took a sample of 20% of the total population or as many as 1084 JUN copies stands. From this study it was concluded that the increment in the second rotation was 2.8 cm / year or decreased by 40%, so to obtain the lowest grade woodworking (AI) it took 7 years and 8 months. If it is continued in the third rotation it requires a cycle of 17 years 8 months to obtain an AI standard and requires a cycle of 26 years 8 months to obtain the AIII standard. From the results above, it is recommended that for JUN copies only until the second rotation because the predicted cycle is still below 10 years. The third rotation cannot be done because the growth of diameter increments is below 2 cm / year, so the cycle takes more than 10 years.  

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Meiganati, K. B. (2019). RIAP PERTUMBUHAN JATI UNGGUL NUSANTARA ROTASI KEDUA DI KEBUN PERCOBAAN COGREG UNIVERSITAS NUSA BANGSA. Jurnal Nusa Sylva, 17(2), 101–105. https://doi.org/10.31938/jns.v17i2.207
Section
Articles

Metrics

References

Badan Standardisasi Nasional. 2003. SNI 01-5007.1-2003 tentang Produk Kayu Bundar – Bagian 1: Kayu Bundar Jati

Hamilton L. dan Colac. 2000. Managing Coppice in Eucalyptus Plantation. Information Notes. Departement of Primary Industries. Victoria, Australia. http:// www. dpi. vic. gov.au

Martawijaya, A., Kartasujana, Y.I. Mandang, S.A. Prawira dan K. Kadir, 1989. Atlas Kayu Indonesia Jilid II. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kehutanan. Departemen Kehutanan Indonesia. Bogor

Nyland, R.D. 2001. Silviculture, Concept and Application. Mc. Graw Hill. New York.

Setyaningsih, Luluk. Fredy Martin Latupeirissa. Bambang Supriono. 2009. Pertumbuhan Jati Unggul Nusantara pada Pola Tanam Tumpangsari di Kebun Percobaan Cogreg. Jurnal Nusa Sylva. Volume 9 No.2 Desember 2009.92-97.

Simon, H. 2005. Metode Inventore Hutan. Cetakan I. Pustaka Pelajar. Yogyakarta. (Halaman 129-139)

Susila, IWW. 2012. Model Dugaan Volume dan Riap Tegakan Jati (Tectona grandis L.F) di Nusa Penida, Klungkung Bali. Jurnal Penelitian Hutan Tanaman.Volume 9 No. 3. September 2012. 165-178.

Suwandhi, Ichsan. 2013. Arsitek Pohon dan Arsitek Akar: Hubungannya dengan Pertumbuhan Pohon dan Kualitas Kayu. Paper. Program Pasca Sarjana IPB. Bogor.

Wahyuningtyas, RS. 2010. Hutan Rakyat Trubusan sebagai Alternatif Sistem Permudaan. Galam Volume IV No. 3 Desember 2010 (Hal 189 – 207).

Wibowo, A. 2013. Uji Coba Tebangan Kayu Perhutanan Klon Jati (JPP) dan Trubusannya. Studi Kasus Petak 61a BKPH Kedunggalar KPH Ngawi.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>